Appendix: Embedding Domain Knowledge for Estimating Customer Lifetime Value

How we designed an interpretable neural network to predict Customer Lifetime Value (Appendix)

This is an appendix to the blog post Embedding Domain Knowledge for Estimating Customer Lifetime Value. We will describe some alternatives we considered for solving the proposed problem, but did not end up being implemented.

First, let’s assume we have a pre-trained model for estimating the probability of the target $yAlive_N$ and $yTaker$.

Estimating Lifetime Value using an optimization function

With a model containing client propensity of accepting the offer (yTaker), we can make a simple calculation for estimating CLTV:

Business Rules only approach

     \begin{eqnarray*} argmax & ( & \\ \text{X in Offer} & & (Propensity(User, X) \times PriceDest(X) \times 24 + \\ & & (1-Propensity(User, X)) \times PriceOrigin(User, X) * FP)\\ & ) & \\ \end{eqnarray*}

The first term of the equation is the expected revenue at the end of the fidelization period (FP), which is being renewed to 24 months. A second term is summed, comprised of the expected revenue in case the client does not accept the offer (and assuming no new offer is made in the remaining months – as such, he remains for “FP” months).

Business Rules + Propensity + Churn Model approach

Let’s now assume we have two models:

  • Propensity Model: we can calculate the probability of y_taker_N (i.e., of client accepting the offer)
  • Churn Model: we can predict the number of remaining months until the client churns

And that we also have some business rules embedded:

  • Survival Buyers: we can calculate global survival curves, for the complete customer base (Buyers), for clients which accept any new offer. These give us the average number of months until the client leaves the company, if he accepts an offer.

We can then create a slightly more complex optimization function.

     \begin{eqnarray*} argmax & ( & ( PriceDest(X) \times Buyers(FP) \times Propensity(User,X) + \\ \text{X in Offer} & & (1-Propensity(User, X)) \times PriceOrigin(User, X) \times \\ & & Churn(User) \\ & ) & \\ \end{eqnarray*}

Single-Task Machine Learning 

Although this is a solution that can be quickly calculated in case pre-trained models are available for churn and taker tasks (which is good for quick proofs of concept and baseline performance), we are not using much of the knowledge which can be extracted from customer interaction.

A possible approach for using this is including the probabilities of accepting the offer and churning as features, as follows:

CLTV :: Propensity x OriginOffer x DestinationOffer x ChurnProbability

However, this would require maintaining three models in production, and assessing their quality constantly: a regression model for estimating customer lifetime value, propensity model and churn model. Also, if we wanted to do a multiple output approach, this would require having as many pre-trained models as the number of outputs.

Like this story?

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Special offers, latest news and quality content in your inbox once per month.

Signup single post

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recommended Articles

Can Your Business Optimize AI Predictive Models?

Predictive models are transforming the AI landscape. They can forecast future events, identify past occurrences, and even predict present situations. However, building a successful predictive model is not as simple as it seems. To achieve an effective predictive model, you need to consider three crucial moments: the prediction time, the prediction window, and the data […]

Read More
Is Your Business Ready for Generative AI Risks?

Generative AI is a powerful tool that many companies are rushing to incorporate into their operations. However, it’s crucial to understand the possible risks associated with this technology. In this article, we’ll discuss the top nine risks that could impact your business’s readiness for AI integration. Stay ahead of the curve, and make sure you’re […]

Read More
Can the STAR Framework Streamline Your AI Projects?

As a manager dealing with AI projects, you may often find yourself overwhelmed. The constant addition of promising projects to the backlog can lead to a mounting technical debt within your team, forcing you to neglect the core aspects of your business. Here at NILG.AI, we have a solution for this challenge: the STAR framework. […]

Read More